[time-nuts] Turning off PPS when not enough satellites
df6jb at ulrich-bangert.de
Thu Aug 3 02:32:20 EDT 2006
>Tell me why the above receiver with external freq in/output is a bad
Perhaps BECAUSE it has a external freq in? If TVB is right (he usually
is) the quality of the externally applied signal should better be in the
cs/h-maser catgory. Boy, if i had a cs or a h-maser available on my lab
bench to generate the input for the receiver I would perhaps bother with
other things than with gps receivers.
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: bg at lysator.liu.se [mailto:bg at lysator.liu.se]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 20:48
> An: Ulrich Bangert
> Cc: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [time-nuts] Turning off PPS when not
> enough satellites
> On Wed, August 2, 2006 19:33, Ulrich Bangert said:
> > Björn,
> >> I do like Poul-Hennings forumulation better...
> > The right to have a own opinion and to communicate it
> freely is one of
> > our western-world-luxuries that I am a special fan of! Feel heartly
> > invited to have different opinion than me!
> I support your opinion completely! ;-)
> Ok, lets take an example.
Tell me why the above receiver with external freq in/output is a bad
Tell me why the same receiver is a bad navigation receiver.
Hmmm... I am off to fetch some suchi. more later.
More information about the time-nuts