[time-nuts] Basic Stratum 1 question

[Bruce Lane]

Good day,

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 02-Aug-07 at 11:32 Jared Morrisen wrote:

>); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
>Errors-To: time-nuts-bounces+kyrrin=bluefeathertech.com at febo.com RETRY
>
>Hi,
>
>I am having a debate with our CIO.  He wrote in a memo about timing:
>
>*Local hardware is to be considered Stratum 1, since it get time from its
>own CMOS.*
>
>
>
>I told him that absurd and that it can't be considered stratum 1.

	That is indeed absurd. Here's a link to the Stratum timing definitions.

	http://www.raltron.com/products/pdfspecs/sync_an02-StratumLevelDefined.pdf

	Happy convincing. There are many people who would rather strangle themselves than admit they're wrong.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?"