[time-nuts] Timing on Ethernet
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Sun Aug 5 12:13:41 EDT 2007
In message <200708050858.47945.bob.paddock at gmail.com>, Bob Paddock writes:
>); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
>We found the best "waveguide" experience was in
>the range of 300 to 420 MHz, but the distance is very limited,
>hundreds of feet at most. The main problem at different frequencies
>is the material becomes absorptive at lower frequencies,
>or reflective at higher frequencies causing to much mutilpath
>distortion.
Most mines are in coal or metalrich rock, wouldn't that make
your experience more pessimistic than the tunnels at CERN which,
as far as I remember, is in pretty 'worthless' rock ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list