[time-nuts] Setting Rubidium to match GPS source
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Fri Sep 28 19:01:45 EDT 2007
SAIDJACK at aol.com wrote:
> Hi HMurray,
> depends on the GPSDO. On the Fury for example you can expect the unit to
> wander less than +-15ns back and forth over a period of 1 Day. That's a
> deviation of about 3.5E-013 or so per 24 hours.
> This wander depends on how good the hold position is that is set inside the
> GPSDO's GPS receiver, as well as the stability of the OCXO, and the quality of
> the GPS receiver.
> All standard GPS receivers have problems with height:
> We see a range of about +-2 Meters max on the height on the Motorola M12+
> receiver on different Fury units for example. The newer M12M motorola/iLotus
> receiver is slightly better than this.
> This would lead to a worst case error of up to 12ns just due to this antenna
> position error, slightly more than a good Cesium would wander.
Where does the 12ns figure come from?
Surely a height error of 2m leads to a timing error of about 6.6ns for a
particular SV when that SV is directly overhead.
When the SV isnt directly overhead a 2m error in height contributes less
error than this to the slant range and the corresponding propagation
delay error from the SV to the antenna will be less than 6.6ns.
More information about the time-nuts