[time-nuts] Fw: Austron 2100F
stanley_reynolds at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 12 14:41:40 EDT 2008
If I divide one of the phase corrected outputs to PPS and use it instead of a gps receiver to discipline the input reference crystal oscillator would this system have any advantage over the corrected outputs? I did find a web reference where NASA was using a 2100 receiver to discipline a Austron 2010B reference as part of a triple redundant clock (GPS, Loran-C, and Cesium beam).
----- Original Message ----
From: Dan Rae <danrae at verizon.net>
To: Stanley Reynolds <stanley_reynolds at yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:23:35 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Austron 2100F
Stanley Reynolds wrote:
> Yes, would like to know about the phase corrected outputs, any specs,
> are they close to the accuracy of the Loran signal it's self ?
Nothing claimed in the specs. It just says: "Square wave output, will
drive 1 standard TTL load" for both 1 and 10 MHz. Long term, I'm
guessing it approaches that of the Loran signal.
It looks like the no suffix version is a bit different from the others.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the time-nuts