[time-nuts] ADEV vs. OADEV
Tom Van Baak
tvb at LeapSecond.com
Fri Jan 23 05:23:47 UTC 2009
> Trouble is, the algorithm Tom and Ulrich wants to denote OAVAR others
> have already denoted AVAR, thus causing ambiguity.
One can equally say the algorithm you now want to call simply
"AVAR" others long before you chose to call "overlapping AVAR"
in order to clearly distinguish it from the pre-existing label that
you no longer even want to call "AVAR".
Personally I prefer to call it AVAR/ADEV when the implementation
isn't relevant; and in those cases when it is, I specifically qualify
the name with something like "normal" vs. "overlapping". That
removes the ambiguity regardless of historical interpretation.
We've beat this to death now and all understand the issues, yes?
More information about the time-nuts