[time-nuts] Reverse isolation
Bruce Griffiths
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Tue Mar 10 02:08:20 UTC 2009
Didier
A 10-1000mW of single mode ECDL helps.
But then you need a modulator.
You would also need to avoid frying any photomixer at the other end.
Bruce
Didier wrote:
> But not necessarily lowest noise
>
> Didier
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com
>> [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On Behalf Of Don Latham
>> Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 8:48 PM
>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Reverse isolation
>>
>> Best isolation is via a piece of fiber optics.
>> Don
>>
>> Bruce Griffiths
>>
>>> Lux, James P wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Actually, it depends on the distance from the hot carrier, the
>>>>> amplitude of the hot carrier and the particular VNA in
>>>>>
>> question. My
>>
>>>>> VNA allows me to change filters as well as integration time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> And especially, where is the selectivity in the VNA's
>>>>
>> receiver? You
>>
>>>> might have a 10 Hz filter, but if the receiver's front end is wide
>>>> open, then the dynamic range requirement might be a challenge to
>>>> meet.
>>>>
>>>> Consider a 30 dB gain amplifier claiming 120dB reverse isolation..
>>>>
>>>> You put in -30dBm and get 0dBm out in the forward direction.
>>>> Meanwhile, you inject 0dBm into the output of the
>>>>
>> amplifier (from the
>>
>>>> VNA) and you expect to see -120dBm appearing at the input.
>>>>
>> Depending
>>
>>>> on how good the directional coupler/bridge is that feed the port 1
>>>> reflected power receiver, you might be facing measuring a -120dBm
>>>> signal next to a -30dBm signal, which is challenging...
>>>>
>>>> Assuming the DUT is linear (hah!) one could just apply load with
>>>> different reflection coefficients to it when measuring S11. This
>>>> might even be harder, though... With -120dBm reverse isolation,
>>>> you're basically looking at seeing the effect of adding a coherent
>>>> signal 90 dB down to the signal you're already measuring for S11.
>>>> That's not going to result in a huge change in amplitude or phase
>>>> (e.g. About 1 part in 1E4 or 1E5)..
>>>>
>>>> Maybe for this list, though.. Measuring phase shifts of
>>>>
>> 1E-5 radian..
>>
>>>> Walk
>>>> in the park, as it were.
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>> Its even more challenging when the isolation amplifier has
>>>
>> a nominal
>>
>>> gain of 0dB coupled with a reverse isolation of 120dB or more.
>>> In this case one would be looking at measuring phase shifts on the
>>> order of 1urad or less.
>>>
>>> In this case one could try applying say a +10dBm signal to
>>>
>> the input,
>>
>>> modulate the load reflection coefficient and look for a modulation
>>> frequency related sideband at the input port.
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
>> Six Mile Systems LLP
>> 17850 Six Mile Road
>> POB 134
>> Huson, MT, 59846
>> VOX 406-626-4304
>> www.lightningforensics.com
>> www.sixmilesystems.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list