[time-nuts] Frequency Stability of An Individual Oscillator:Negative Values?

Bob Camp lists at rtty.us
Thu Apr 22 21:32:14 UTC 2010


How to treat a negative is up to you, it's obviously indicating a "not real"
outcome. Zero is also a "not real" for realizable oscillators. Most simply
note the result as "below floor", drop it, and proceed.

Since the variability of the data is driving the negative results, it's
unlikely that another approach will massively improve things (with the same
data set). The practical answer is to use oscillators with closer noise
performance to reduce the scatter or to improve the data collection method
if it's the limiting factor. 


-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Kyle Wesson
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 5:07 PM
To: time-nuts at febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Frequency Stability of An Individual
Oscillator:Negative Values?


I am working to determine the Allan variance of an individual
oscillator from a series of three paired measurements as described in
the paper by Gray and Allan "A Method for Estimating the Frequency
Stability of An Individual Oscillator" (NIST, 1974,
tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/57.pdf). In this report they make reference to
the statistical uncertainty of the measurement due to ensemble noise
and potential clock phase correlation which can potentially make the
Allan variance for an individual oscillator have a negative value.
They write:

"If the noise level of the oscillator being measured is low enough,
and the scatter high enough, equation (4) may occasionally give a
negative value for the variance."

My question is: how should I treat negative variance values in this
case? For example, if my data set were to produce an individual
oscillator Allan variance with a value of -5e-12, should I convert
this value to 0 (ie. the closest valid sigma value to the number since
0 <= sigma < inf ), take the absolute value of the result (ie. turn
-5e-12 to +5e-12), or drop the result from my estimate of individual
oscillator frequency stability altogether?

Is there another method that will produce estimates of individual
oscillators from an ensemble approach but assures non-negative output

Thank you in advance,

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.

More information about the time-nuts mailing list