[time-nuts] True to there word. - Fancy WWVB
Bob Camp
lists at cq.nu
Tue Feb 9 02:37:06 UTC 2010
Hi
My assumption is that that the same propagation effects that move the phase also delay the arrival of the modulation. The ID on WWVB is a 45 degree (?) carrier phase shift. At the very least, I think you would need to let the loop know about that.
I do hardware one week and software the next. Right now I'm writing a bunch of Perl ....
Bob
On Feb 8, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Bob Camp <lists at cq.nu> wrote:
>
>> I assume that you are going to have to train your loop to "expect" the ID shifts and time
>> markers. Again, they are predictable.
>
> Would it not be easier to use the WWVB Zero-Crossings to sync something?
> Then the power shifts should not mater.
>
>> It's just software ....
>
> You must be a hardware person... :-)
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.wearablesmartsensors.com/
> http://www.softwaresafety.net/
> http://www.designer-iii.com/
> http://www.unusualresearch.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list