[time-nuts] Rb Oscillator - rather fundamental question
David C. Partridge
david.partridge at dsl.pipex.com
Tue Feb 23 18:59:02 UTC 2010
Sorry - I should have written a longer response - but you've put it all
I wonder how long it will be before the definition of the second is changed
to use the newer types of clocks using strontium, ytterbium, mercury, or
aluminium (which I believe is the current "front runner")?
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Sent: 23 February 2010 17:13
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Rb Oscillator - rather fundamental question
> Well, what you said is true as far as it goes, but not the whole story.
Rick Karlquist N6RK
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts