[time-nuts] Z3805 utility, Was: AW: (no subject)
Robert Benward
rbenward at verizon.net
Mon May 24 12:27:34 UTC 2010
Bob,
I just went out an ordered a bunch of gender changers and null modem cables, and a DB9 tester (with a NM switch!). I
started doing the same as you, using a sharpie to mark my cable.
An update, the unit has been running overnight, the holdover light is on, but nothing else. I still suspect the RS-232
is dead. I now have to suspect my other antenna as well. It was good when pulled out of service, but who knows. I
wish I had my old Garmin 45 with the external antenna. I also ordered an RS-422 adapter. I'm hoping I can connect with
that.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Camp" <lists at rtty.us>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts at febo.com>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Z3805 utility, Was: AW: (no subject)
> Hi
>
> Gotta label them *something* or sorting through them in the cable bin becomes pretty difficult.
>
> In addition to the wiring options you can (obviously) have either a male or female on either end. There are so many
> "odd" pieces of gear out there that you can have pretty much any combination.
>
> Bob
>
>
> On May 23, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Robert Benward wrote:
>
>> My experience with the term "straight through" is that I've seen RS-232 cable that have the ground pin connected to
>> the shell. In a "straight through" the pins are one to one and the only thing connected to the shell would be the
>> shield if one is available.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Camp" <lists at rtty.us>
>> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts at febo.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 9:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Z3805 utility, Was: AW: (no subject)
>>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Long ago I decided to go with the terms "straight" and "null modem" for the cables I use. NM and ST are easy to mark
>>> and hard to confuse.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 23, 2010, at 8:58 PM, jimlux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stanley Reynolds wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>> Dec computers / terminal servers were as I described, but many brands
>>>>> were different. Still have a BOB aka break out box with LEDs to
>>>>> indicate levels, matching transmit and receive is easy, getting the
>>>>> hardware flow control / signaling right was a little more difficult.
>>>>> straight cable = pin to pin
>>>>> crossed cable = null modem = swapped pins
>>>>> The phrase "null modem" comes from no modems or the configuration
>>>>> that allows two singular ports to be connected, this cable would
>>>>> cross the receive and transmit pins, and some would call it a cross
>>>>> over cable. A null modem cable would be used to connect two computers
>>>>> together and a program like kermit used to transfer files.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yep.. DTE cable to DCE communications medium(phoneline) DCE to DTE
>>>> DCE == Modem (e.g. a Bell 202 or 212, for instance)
>>>>
>>>> There were the flow control (RTS/CTS) used to turn around a half duplex link. And, there are also the secondary
>>>> transmit and receive (for a low rate reverse channel). If you were receiving data from the link (DCE), you'd
>>>> assert RTS, and when the modem had switched, it would tell you CTS, and off you'd go. (fancy modems used the
>>>> reverse channel to send the request to the far end, which would acknowledge... others just use a fixed time delay)
>>>> There are also pins for the clock (since some of these modems were used on synchronous data links).
>>>>
>>>> the "crossover" occured in the DCE to DCE link (that is, you'd transmit from one DCE to the other DCE's
>>>> receiver)...
>>>>
>>>> the nominal cable between DTE and DCE was straight through. With no real convention on male/female.. most devices
>>>> had female sockets, and the cables usually were male male plugs. IBM PCs had male on the chassis for DTE, as did
>>>> some PDT-110 (VT-100/LSI-11 smart terminals), but most other terminals (the LSI ADM-x, Hazeltines, etc.) all seemed
>>>> to have female, as did the TI 800 series printer/terminals.
>>>>
>>>> So, a "null modem" was a cable that emulated the DCE to DCE connection..
>>>>
>>>> there are/were various strategies on how sophisticated the reverse is.. do you also send the secondary channel?
>>>> What about clocks? Most folks ignored all that and used RTS/CTS
>>>>
>>>> Or you strap RTS to CTS on your side, the other side does the same.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I think the phrase "standard cable" which could be null or straight
>>>>> depending on the use is the confusing part.
>>>>> Phone cables RJ11 and RJ45 swap the wires which is standard. Network
>>>>> cables match the wires with the same color always on the right which
>>>>> is standard. But even when a phone cable is standard it is not
>>>>> interchangeable with a standard network cable. Again we have a need
>>>>> for cross as well as straight network cables.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And, to make things worse, there are different "pair" arrangements.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list