[time-nuts] Am I the only Time Nut who doesn't wear a watch?
sar10538 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 10 09:27:52 UTC 2011
You'd need one for both wrists and learn to look at the time on
alternate watches or you'll end up with lop sided upper arm muscle
growth. Who needs dumbbells when you can work out just by looking at
the time :)
I wonder what the average time for the novelty to wear out is on one of these.
PS. Well, it is time related.
On 10 July 2011 17:47, Robert Darlington <rdarlington at gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay guys, I saw a very strange timepiece when I was out shopping. If it
> wasn't $17k I'd consider it:
> Interesting concept, looks good. On a side note, earlier today a friend
> gave me an Accutron 214 from 1965 that previously belonged to his father.
> Cool stuff. It needs servicing and cleaning as I can see what looks like
> minor corrosion inside while looking into the battery compartment.
> Greenish flaky stuff on the brass inside.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
More information about the time-nuts