[time-nuts] WWVB Measurements
paulswedb at gmail.com
Mon Mar 28 02:07:35 UTC 2011
Indeed those posts are from 2003 the car plant could be closed these days.
But I do indeed receive wwvb I think pretty well with a loop and preamp. Its
always been a challenge on the east coast and even Michigan when I first
started tinkering way to many years ago.
Pretty much before all these switching power supplies and cpfls etc.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> brooke at pacific.net said:
> > John Mills (THE NTP guru) has written a number of papers on and built
> > examples of a matched filter type receiver for the HF station WWV, but
> > ideas would also be applicable to a WWVB receiver. The performance he
> > from WWV would knock your socks off so I expect a WWVB version would be
> > even better. In addition there are some things that could be done to
> > improve it.
> I assume you mean Dave Mills rather than John.
> He's basically given up on WWVB. In his area, there is too much crap
> 60 KHz, mostly from switching power supplies.
> These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts