[time-nuts] Fwd: Neutrino timing

Chris Albertson albertson.chris at gmail.com
Sun Oct 30 18:23:23 UTC 2011


On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, paul swed <paulswedb at gmail.com> wrote:
> Right but they have that ability and its not good enough.
> The alternative was to

It may very likely be good enough.  Lots of people think they got it
right.  They either have a 60nS timing error which would be huge even
for many home labs or neutrinos really are fast

The goal now is to prove that it's right, or not.  The 60nS anomaly
may very well be a fact of nature.  My guess is that the path length
for neutrinos is shorter than the path length for photons.  Or should
I say the "path length when projected onto there dimensions" is
shorter.


Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California



More information about the time-nuts mailing list