[time-nuts] Low-long-term-drift clock for board level integration?

Brooke Clarke brooke at pacific.net
Tue Feb 21 00:56:54 UTC 2012


Hi Bob:

It was my understanding that the receiving station knows the path taken, is that the case? Or are you saying even when 
it's the same path the time delay has large variations?

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/Brooke4Congress.html


Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since the network is being measured, I suspect that using it as the time reference would present a basic problem.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Jim Lux<jimlux at earthlink.net>  wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/12 10:31 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Simple answer:
>>>
>>> A rack mount cesium standard is as good as you can get. Figure on 15 ns per day of drift. That gets you to 15 us in 1000 days. You may or may not get one that drifts that little, a lot depends on  little details. For>   3 years, consider an ensemble of cesiums. At $50K each cost can go up pretty fast.
>>>
>>> There is nothing out there that will do better stand alone for less money. Either you get a sky view or you change the budget....
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>>>
>>
>> But he *does* have the ability to have an external network connection.. So the real question is whether one could come up with a better-than-NTP scheme to get the 100 (or 10) microseconds.
>>
>> I suspect that with sufficiently controlled network paths (which might be doable in a widescale deployment) and a tweaking of the NTP stuff, you might be able to get it to work.
>>
>> 100 microseconds out of a day is 1E-10, which is actually a fairly liberal drift spec for an OCXO or even a TCXO. (which are things like ppb/day)
>>
>> Maybe there's a particular time of day (or day of week) when network uncertainties are minimal, or can be bounded.  So what you really need is a onboard oscillator that is good at "carry over" between periodic calibration checks.
>>
>>
>> One question about the 100 microsecond spec.. is that a worst case at any instant, or is it an average spec over a day (so a consistent diurnal variation would cancel out)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>



More information about the time-nuts mailing list