[time-nuts] Rb settling time after C-field adjust?

John R. Ackermann N8UR jra at febo.com
Thu Nov 11 14:37:06 EST 2004


Thanks, Jim!

John
----

jim_johnson at agilent.com wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
>     My "guru" agrees as seen from his comments here:
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> For a small change of the C-field, it is probably stable 
> enough after a few minutes.  The slow (and small) change 
> after a few minutes is buried in the frequency fluctuations 
> of the 5065A. 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Regards,
> Jim W6SC
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com]On
>>Behalf Of John R. Ackermann N8UR
>>Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 7:37 AM
>>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Rb settling time after C-field adjust?
>>
>>
>>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>>>In message <41937D3C.3020301 at febo.com>, "John R. Ackermann 
>>
>>N8UR" writes:
>>
>>>>Following up on another thread here a week or so ago, how 
>>
>>long should I 
>>
>>>>expect it to take an HP 5065A Rb to stabilize after a small 
>>
>>(one minor 
>>
>>>>division or so) tweak in the C-field setting?
>>>>
>>>>For small changes, is it a matter of minutes, hours, or days 
>>
>>before it 
>>
>>>>reaches steady-state?
>>>
>>>
>>>minutes, give it 15 and you're sure.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>John
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list
> time-nuts at febo.com
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> 
> 




More information about the time-nuts mailing list