AW: [time-nuts] HP 10811A vs 10811-60111
Hubert v. Bonhorst
hvonbonhorst at t-online.de
Sat Apr 23 11:13:50 EDT 2005
Sorry for page flipped. Attached pdf is for 10811-60111
Von: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] Im
Auftrag von David Kirkby
Gesendet: Samstag, 23. April 2005 16:32
An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Betreff: [time-nuts] HP 10811A vs 10811-60111
Can anyone tell me the difference between the two above oscillators? I
have the manual for the 97page manual (page 2 is upside down), but it
does not mention the latter.
However, I think I have seen a small couple of page document somewhere
which listed the 10811-60111 as having no specification for phase noise,
and so therefore not an ideal choice for a low phase noise oscillator.
One might as well start with something that is specified for a low phase
I can't however now find the exact spec of the 10811-60111. Can anyone
give me it?
I won an auction for a 10811A on eBay and the seller said I could have a
10811-60111 for the same price if I wanted it too. I said no, I wanted
the 10811A, but he has sent me the 10811-60111 instead.
Is the 10811-60111 inferior? How does it differ from the 10811A?
Dr. David Kirkby,
Please check out http://www.g8wrb.org/
of if you live in Essex http://www.southminster-branch-line.org.uk/
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts at febo.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Seiten aus HP10811-Specs.pdf
Size: 9005 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/attachments/20050423/61283615/attachment-0004.pdf
More information about the time-nuts