AW: [time-nuts] HP 10811A vs 10811-60111

Hubert v. Bonhorst hvonbonhorst at
Sat Apr 23 11:13:50 EDT 2005

Sorry for page flipped. Attached pdf is for 10811-60111
Best regards

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: time-nuts-bounces at [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at] Im
Auftrag von David Kirkby
Gesendet: Samstag, 23. April 2005 16:32
An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Betreff: [time-nuts] HP 10811A vs 10811-60111

Can anyone tell me the difference between the two above oscillators? I 
have the manual for the 97page manual (page 2 is upside down), but it 
does not mention the latter.

However, I think I have seen a small couple of page document somewhere 
which listed the 10811-60111 as having no specification for phase noise, 
and so therefore not an ideal choice for a low phase noise oscillator. 
One might as well start with something that is specified for a low phase 

I can't however now find the exact spec of the 10811-60111. Can anyone 
give me it?

I won an auction for a 10811A on eBay and the seller said I could have a 
10811-60111 for the same price if I wanted it too. I said no, I wanted 
the 10811A, but he has sent me the  10811-60111 instead.

Is the 10811-60111 inferior? How does it differ from the 10811A?

Dr. David Kirkby,

Please check out
of if you live in Essex

time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Seiten aus HP10811-Specs.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 9005 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the time-nuts mailing list