[time-nuts] HP 58540A Phase Noise Improvements
John Day
johnday at wordsnimages.com
Fri Jul 7 14:41:45 EDT 2006
You're right Matt. The basic PN performance of the LO chain in the
IC-7800 is not too good. Measurememnts of the IMDR confirm this. So I
personally think looking for a lower phase noise OCXO would be a
fruitless exercise. It would be far more valuable to figure out what
features of the design of the 7800 contribute to the problem. The
IC7800 is a 'strong' receiver in terms of IP3 and IP2 - one of the
best in ham terms, but I am not sure that without drastic internal
surgery you are going to do any better.
Of course, if someone would like to send me an IC7800 I would be
happy to experiment on it!
John
At 01:19 PM 7/7/2006, Matt Ettus wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have any suggestions as a replacement OCXO with excellent phase
> > noise approaching -160 dBc @ 1 kHz? Are there any special precautions or
> > other alignments required when dropping in a replacement OCXO? Thanks!
> >
>
>Paul,
>
>It is very likely that the close-in phase noise of the ICOM is
>determined more by the dividers in the PLL than by the phase noise of
>the reference oscillator, especially at such low levels. Assuming
>that the ICOM divides the 10 MHz down to at least 100 kHz, the phase
>noise of the OCXO would be divided down to -200 dBc, which is well
>below the internal divider noise of the PLL. Thus even an OCXO with
>absolutely no phase noise would not improve things.
>
>Matt
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list
>time-nuts at febo.com
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list