[time-nuts] New frequency standard, Mercury better than Cesium?

Poul-Henning Kamp phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Jul 17 18:30:30 EDT 2006


In message <20060717203222.78738.qmail at web50709.mail.yahoo.com>, Normand Martel
 writes:

>They should be able.... the standard uses a single
>mercury atom!! ;-)

Which interestingly enough might make them incompatible
with the RoHS (Reduction of Harmfull Substances) regulation
here in EU.

As far as I've understood RoHS, you can get away with trace amounts
of heavy metals on the banned list, under a theory of environmental
contamination, but if you include them deliberately, you're in
violation.

Fortunately metrological equipment is easy to get an excemption for :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



More information about the time-nuts mailing list