[time-nuts] ...Your thoughts on the Trimble Resolution T?
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Fri Mar 31 00:45:36 EST 2006
In message <20060331031016.83271.qmail at web50706.mail.yahoo.com>, Normand Martel
writes:
>Performance using clock granularity message:
>
> Better than 2ns, 1 sigma
> Better than 6ns, 6 sigma
>
>Performance NOT using clock granularity message:
>
> Better than 10ns, 1 sigma
> Better than 20ns, 6 sigma
>
>What's that clock granularity message?
That's the "negative sawtooth" correction.
>For me, It looks like a message telling the actual
>error of one particular 1PPs pulse. Does it sound
>right?
Exactly.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list