[time-nuts] Re Danjon Astrolabe
buehl at superlink.net
Fri Sep 29 10:22:01 EDT 2006
Robert's "pinching an idea from the early - - " brings to mind what we did
in the early days of video/ TV. Hope this inspires some useful ideas.
To measure spot size on CRT, a small slit was placed against the TV or
oscilloscope screen and a photo sensor measured the light intensity coming
through the slit. As the circular spot entered the slit, the change in
light intensity increased; and as it left the slit light intensity
decreased. If the slit was wide, the photo detector output has a sine wave
rising edge, a flat top, and a sine wave falling edge. If the slit was
very narrow, there is no flat top.
If we use the slit to watch the sun, we have the equivelent of a pinhole
camera with only one direction of focus. Making a structure with 2
photodetectors, or 3 as TVB suggests, and carefully place such that one is
on each edge of the image. As one outputs a rising edge, the other outputs
a falling edge. In theory, when properly positioned, both photodetectors
will have equal output when the sun image is exactly between
photodetectors. This is also the point of greatet rate of change. This is
equal to the inverse of the "fine wire gnomon" mentioned by TVB.
Simple detection would be using a comparitor or zero crossing
detector. You get one output as the sun approaches the center, and
switches as the sun image crosses center. Any offset or inacruacy would be
identical day to day, so the time interval is repeatable. This should be
very simple to build.
As a computerized approach, each output could be converted with an A to D
and mathematically analyzed. The ultimate refinement would be a linear
array, such as that used in a scanner. If you can get the image to pass
over a linear array with 4,000 pixels within 3 seconds, this would allow
calculating time verses position at the rate of less than 1 millisecond per
Accuracy could be increased by making the distance from the slit to the
detector greater (increasing the size of the pinhole camera image and
increasing the rate of travel across the sensor), or making the slit
smaller, or making the detector diameter smaller. Using a piece of
fiberoptics connected to photodiode makes the detection diamater equal to
the fiber. I have had good results attaching one end of cheap plastic
fiber to tip of photodiode with clear glue or epoxy. Cheap plastic fiber
like that used in decorative lamps, or experimentor type sold by Radio
Shack, will also pass IR for short distances.
One source of inacuracy is when a sloud only shades one edge of the sun. I
suspect the IR image of the sun is more precise than the visible image,
because defraction (tildel effect) is less when passing through clouds.
Since a slit provides only one direction of movement, proper angular
positioning of the slit would minimise changes in the suns orbit from day
to day, week to week.
Would like to hear comments from those amoung you having greater expertise
in designing such a device.
At 03:27 AM 9/29/2006, you wrote:
>How about pinching an idea from the early radar and missile technologies
>- Conical Scanning. Basically you offset the detector of feed antenna
>from the point of focus and then rotate it. If the signal is off centre
>you get sinusoidal modulation of the signal. The phase of the modulation
>tells the antenna steering what direction to move to get back on target.
>A practical solution is to angle and spin the secondary mirror of a
>reflecting (e.g. cassegrain) telescope. A index sensor gives you your
>From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
>Behalf Of Dr Bruce Griffiths
>Sent: 29 September 2006 01:09
>To: Tom Van Baak; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Re Danjon Astrolabe
>Tom Van Baak wrote:
> >> The scheme probably needs three photocells to be sure that the one
> >> in the middle is darker than the others. Might be able to mask it
> >> with a slit and use a fine wire gnomon, in a coarse/fine servo.
> >> Could use a variable frequency motor and precision reduction, like
> >> a phonograph turntable only much slower.
> > SNIP
>Whilst the resolution may be good, the accuracy of an open loop
>microstepped stepper motor isn't that great.
>Its usually worse than when not using microstepping.
>Variations in friction torque on the motor will also dramatically affect
>its positioning accuracy.
>A high resolution position encoder mounted on the sundial base is
>essential if you need to accurately determine its direction.
>Servomotors with encoder feedback will achieve a much higher performance
>than a stepper motor.
>If gears or rollers are used then backlash in gears or microcreep in
>rollers will reduce the positioning accuracy.
>The sundial base bearing runout can also affect positioning accuracy.
>The equivalent time error is not likely to be much smaller than a few
>seconds at best
>time-nuts mailing list
>time-nuts at febo.com
>Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not
>necessarily Genetix Ltd (Genetix) or any company associated with it. This
>email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for
>the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient
>or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be
>advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is
>strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please
>notify Genetix by telephone on +44 (0)1425 624600.
>The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is
>strictly forbidden. This mail and any attachments have been scanned for
>viruses prior to leaving Genetix network. Genetix will not be liable for
>direct, special, indirect or consequential damages as a result of any
>virus being passed on, or arising from alteration of the contents of this
>message by a third party.
>time-nuts mailing list
>time-nuts at febo.com
More information about the time-nuts