[time-nuts] Of rubidium life and piggy-bank anemia....
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Sat Dec 1 04:56:29 EST 2007
In message <475127AB.6010300 at xtra.co.nz>, Bruce Griffiths writes:
>You don't actually require a latch for each input as long as flag bits
>(one per input channel) are used to denote which transitions occurred at
>the latched count.
>The flag bits should be latched along with the count.
The latches are for resolving meta-stability issues between the two
clock domains.
>Using a PCI card is perhaps a recipe for planned obsolescence.
>If the input transition rates are relatively low (eg with PPS inputs)
>then an onboard microprocessor with a serial port has more than
>sufficient bandwidth to keep up.
Yes, but using a PCI card makes it possible to use the setup as
timebase for your computer as well :-)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list