[time-nuts] FMT Results Published !

[Connie Marshall]

It was also interesting to note that there were four stations within 1Hz, on
three of the four bands, and all four were over 1Hz high on W1AW 40 meters.

The station that copied both 40 meters signals to less than 1Hz was off by
more than 1Hz on the other two bands.

Here are my results if any one wants to fill in call signs on the spread
sheet. In the old FMT days call signs were published with the results.

160 -0.27
80  -0.45
40  -1.13

WA6ZTY
40  -0.07

Connie
K5CM
Oklahoma


-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com]On
Behalf Of Mike Fahmie
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 11:59 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FMT Results Published !


At 07:05 AM 3/7/2007, you wrote:
>Mike Fahmie wrote:
> > 2006 FMT results have appeared at:
> >
> > http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/fmt/2006/2006-fmt-results.html
> >
>
>It is curious that none of us managed to be within 1 Hz on 3 bands.  I
>missed out by 1.4 Hz on 40M ... but then there were a lot of us who
>measured on the low side on 40 relative to the umpire.
>
>
>-Joe KM1P
>   Boston MA

There are a number of things that point toward W1AW being about a hertz
high.

1.) Though W1AW received nearly 3 times as many 40M reports as WA6ZTY, each
had nearly the same number of reports in the <1 Hz group, but W1AW had 4
times as many in the 1 to 5 Hz group.

2.) If you look at entries who were in the <1 Hz group on other
measurements, they were all about 1 Hz low on W1AW's 40 M signal.

3.) Only one person who copied WA6ZTY <1 Hz copied W1AW <1 Hz.

-Mike-


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts at febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts