[time-nuts] Phase locked local oscillator results
Peter Schmelcher
nebula at telus.net
Thu Oct 11 01:02:12 EDT 2007
Hi all,
I have been playing with a phase and frequency locked local oscillator in
my 3816A GPS receiver. The simple setup uses the OCXO output as an external
reference input to a HP 3325A and with a trivial mod to the VP GPS receiver
the 3325A becomes its local oscillator. The setup improves the short term
stability of the OCXO. Which I guess in hindsight is not very surprising.
Logging data every 5 seconds using GPSCon the AD drops to under 0.5. I
tested two different approaches. One setup used a fixed LO frequency of
19095750.191 Hz. To my surprise the prime number fraction chosen to give
the time interval interpolator a workout results in an auto correlation
peak at 1000 seconds when the EFC is viewed with the plotter program. The
second approach used dithering. The LO center frequency was set to
19095750.2 Hz and continuously ramped up and down every 10 seconds +-0.035
Hz. This causes the pps pulse to dither slightly more than one sawtooth
period over a 5 second interval (the GPS pps pulse edge is just a LO clock
edge). Dithering however is a pain to adjust because timing the start of
the ramp with respect to the pps output is trial and error and not at all
repeatable with my setup. Both approaches result in a pps standard
deviation of about 6.4ns. Further small improvements might be possible but
would require adjusting the phase of the 3325A over the gpib interface to
lock the sawtooth residual to some constant value.
For the truly adventurous the next level requires some artificial
intelligence like
<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/19/30540/01408297.pdf?arnumber=1408297>http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/19/30540/01408297.pdf?arnumber=1408297
unfortunately only the abstract is on the web. As I recall the authors
report 2.5ns of uncertainty over a day when compared to a cesium reference
and over 10 times improvement in the MDEV plot of the OCXO.
A second rather simple modification to reduce temperature induced tuning I
tried is to power the oven with a separate isolated 12V supply. The only
common connections are the EFC pin the reference output voltage pin and
whatever point you decide to attach in the oven as a signal ground (if you
are worried about power supply sequencing you can always add a diode). I
connected the signal ground to the inner oven ground pin which does not
have any voltage drops caused by the outer oven heater current. The ideal
signal ground point would be somewhere inside the inner oven where no
current induced voltage drops would modulate the EFC tuning voltage. To get
an idea of the magnitude of the improvement you can measure the voltage
drop from the oven ground pin to the ground pin of the DAC voltage
reference. I haven't combined the isolated oven supply and the phase locked
LO in a single test yet.
For the curious I have a 6 day GPSCon log file of the two LO setups
compressed down to a half Meg let me know if interested and I will email it
to you.
Enjoy,
Peter
nebula at telus.net
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list