[time-nuts] Parallel voltage regulators
donmer at woosh.co.nz
Fri Oct 26 02:59:53 EDT 2007
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Griffiths" <bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
<time-nuts at febo.com>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Parallel voltage regulators
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: time-nuts-bounces+donmer=woosh.co.nz at febo.com RETRY
> Magnus Danielson wrote:
>> From: Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz>
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Parallel voltage regulators
>> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:42:51 +1300
>> Message-ID: <47201ECB.6050702 at xtra.co.nz>
>>> Don Collie wrote:
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>> If you really want to regulate the oven`s supply voltage, my
>>>> Voltage Regulator handbook shows that the LM317T will supply over 2
>>>> with an input/output differential of between 5, and 12.5 Volts. A
>>>> single one
>>>> of these should do the job OK.
>>>> Cheers!,.................................Don Collie jnr.
>>> Never rely on typical specs always use the minimum spec which is 1.5A
>>> not quite enough.
>> You want design-margin. Some of that toll will be in less than optimum
>> some will be in less heating in the first place (compared to upper limit)
>> for a power regulating aspect, headroom allows better regulations.
>> In one design we had to parallel the regulators since the regulator the
>> designer put in just barely was able to regulate the CPU core voltage.
>> It worked, but at just rebooted at some vauge point an the memory tests.
>> What actually happend was that as soon as it started to actually do
>> the regulator was running at its limit and output voltage dropped as the
>> current was rising and the voltage supervision pulled the RESET.
>> That's what you get from reading the typical reading on the CPU current
>> match that with the maximum rating of the power regulator. A no margin
>> That designer had a few more flaws which was creeping around in that
>> but let's not bring that can of worms open here. :)
>> The 5A LM338 will be just fine. Infact, you can pull 8A out of it under
>> certain conditions.
> Hej Magnus
> The LM338 thermal design is also much easier (it has a much lower
> junction to case thermal resistance than an LM317) especially if the
> circuit is intended to operate over wide temperature (0 -40C or more)
> and mains voltage ranges (+-10% or more).
> The alleged problem with the high short circuit current is easily solved
> by using diodes with adequate current ratings in conjunction with a fuse
> to protect the transformer if it isnt rated to produce an 8A dc output.
> The startup current of the load (rubidium standard) may also vary with
> temperature and /or input voltage.
> Either find the manufacturers specifications or allow adequate margins.
> Worst case design is desirable even for one off circuits especially if
> the circuit is published.
> When the design is publicly available one is in effect transferring the
> production run problems associated with a marginal design to many
> individuals rather than a single factory or production line.
>I don`t think the higher current created when a fuse is used instead of
>near-instantaneous current limiting is "alleged", but rather a real problem
>that can cause damage further down the line. Fast acting current limiting
>is preferable to all but the fastest fuses that are designed to protect
>semiconductors. Current limiting plus thermal shutdown in the regulator
will protect both load, and regulator [and resovior capacitor, and diodes,
and transformer] Commonly available fuses won`t give much protection to the
load - especially the delay types often necessary with large filter
A precision, proven, high performance, low noise regulator like the 723
using an external pass transistor [or preferably a darlington], to avoid
chip heating, and a well bypassed reference would be a lovely solution.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts