[time-nuts] Voltage standards
David Forbes
dforbes at dakotacom.net
Mon Dec 1 01:12:56 UTC 2008
At 4:23 PM -0800 11/30/08, Lux, James P wrote:
>Exactly.. I'm sure I'm not the only one on this list that has
>contemplated home use of liquid helium or even making the stuff.
>Hey, if Onnes could do it 100 years ago, so can we.
>
>I assume the cryogen isn't being used for superconductivity in this
>case, but for just being cold. In which case, perhaps LH2 or LN2
>would serve almost as well. The latter, particularly, is pretty
>manageable (i.e. You don't have to make it yourself).
>
>Cost wise, I like the snippet I read in Scientific American a decade
>or so ago.. LN2 is the cost of milk, LHe is the cost of fine scotch
>whisky
>Is a obsessive precision worth a bottle of scotch?
>
>Jim
I work in a lab where LHe is around much of the time. So it's not
that far of a stretch for me to contemplate using it, although I
don't personally handle the stuff.
We also have a few obsolete receiver Dewars lying around... one of
them could be retrofitted to hold a cryogenic standard if we felt
like it.
But there's the "rent" of regularly buying that LHe to keep the
standard cold. Kinda like being a drunkard on fine Scotch whisky
without the buzz.
--
--David Forbes, Tucson, AZ
http://www.cathodecorner.com/
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list