[time-nuts] New topics (was Re: He is a Time-Nut Troublemaker....)
Bruce Griffiths
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Tue Dec 23 22:38:28 UTC 2008
Magnus Danielson wrote:
> Bruce Griffiths skrev:
>
>> John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>>
>>> Hal Murray said the following on 12/23/2008 01:58 PM:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> 2. Several measurement techniques require a given phase relationship
>>>>> (e.g., quadrature) between DUT and reference. For HF frequencies (ie,
>>>>> 5 or 10 MHz) is there a *practical* phase shifter design covering
>>>>> 180+ degrees that doesn't involve switching various lengths of coax
>>>>> in and out of the line?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> PLL up by a factor of N, use that to drive a DDS, then filter. Maybe a pair
>>>> of DDSes will get better tracking.
>>>>
>>>> For each possible phase offset, you need N slots in the table. (N/4 with
>>>> more work)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> If doing phase noise or short term stability measurements, wouldn't the
>>> noise of the DDS impact the results?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> John
>>
>> When measuring the phase noise of amplifiers and other devices with
>> relatively low phase shifts at 10MHz (or 5MHz) one can start with a
>> quadrature hybrid to produce test and reference signals in approximate
>> quadrature. One then only has to compensate for the UUT delay using an
>> splitter an, attenuator and another quadrature hybrid to produce the
>> small phase shift required.
>> One can even use a mixer as a dc controlled attenuator for the fine
>> phase adjustment to interpolate between attenuator steps.
>>
>
> Using two mixers programmed by two individual DC signals the quadrature
> signal can be setup to arbitrary phase shift. It is trivial to combine
> programmed damping and phase-shift in this fashion.
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
>
>
Hej Magnus
See patent US3803499 for one implementation of this scheme.**
**However, where possible, a lower noise more stable system usually
results when the phase shift provided by such a system is relatively
small.**
**Bruce
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list