[time-nuts] Comparing Reference Accuracy
stanley_reynolds at yahoo.com
Fri May 23 00:10:12 EDT 2008
----- Original Message ----
From: Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz>
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts at febo.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:01:27 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Comparing Reference Accuracy
Stanley Reynolds wrote:
> Stanley Reynolds wrote:
>> Disabling all the GPS receivers at the same time would allow a comparison of the hold over of each. As we are also logging the temp and power some changes in these would also help determine how "good" each DO is as far as stability.
> You still need a frequency comparison scheme with sufficient resolution
> and low intrinsic noise (perhaps 1E-12 or better at 1sec).
> Since the long term average frequencies of the various oscillators are
> not necessarily identical in hold mode, a phase comparison scheme with a
> relatively wide dynamic range is required to avoid frequent phase wrapping.
> With the default settings the reduced VE2ZAZ controler would count all 160,000,000 pluses in a 16s period, phase is not measured so it has no wrap just the +-1 count.
> Looking at the orginal Brooks Shera design you would not need the DAC chip and any neg power requlator to use it as a measuring device. And the clock U7 ECS300S-24 could be shared between the multi sets of boards. I'm not sure if it could be adapted futher for this meassuring task.
If you can live with the resultant degraded performance.
The point is that the resolution is at best 100ns single shot with a
This can be improved by using a higher frequency clock.
However using say a 1GHz clock introduces significant engineering/design
problems if 1ns resolution is to be achieved.
If you persist in not using a synchroniser, as they do, then calculated
averages are biased.
If the system noise isn't around 1 clock period other "interesting"
The performance is inadequate for characterising even a moderately good
oscillator with a 16s gate time.
When using an interpolator the required system noise level for unbiased
averaging is significantly decreased to a few interpolator LSBs.
Merely counting the number of pulses in a fixed gate time is inferior to
high resolution timestamping every Nth zero crossing of the frequency to
This counter may be close : http://www.psplc.com/datasheets/vigo/VOITC-200.pdf
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts