[time-nuts] What is the best counter for a Time Nuts?
bruce.griffiths at xtra.co.nz
Wed Oct 8 21:25:14 UTC 2008
Tom Van Baak wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
> My understanding is that 1) the 53132A has a single-shot
> resolution of about 150 ps, but also 2) it can do something like
> 200,000 phase measurement per second for CW RF inputs.
> In frequency mode, the frequency computed and displayed
> each second is the result of internal statistics on those
> 200,000 samples, which in general is much better than two
> single TI measurements made 1 second apart.
> In the best case of no correlation between input and timebase
> the frequency resolution would be 150 ps / sqrt(200 000), which
> is sub-ps.
> In reality, depending on the numerical character of the input RF
> frequency, you don't get the full sqrt(200000) factor. Page 3-13
> of the 53132A user manual tries to explain this. But for most
> input frequencies it is in the low picoseconds, which is why it
> can be called a 12-digit per second counter. Google for
> 53132a user manual for a copy of the manual.
It is feasible to achieve a somewhat higher timestamp resolution (~20ps)
and continuous sampling rate (> 1.5MSPS) than those of the 53132A
relatively inexpensively provided that a DSP or similar processor is
used to process the time stamp data in real time.
It is also possible to use a SR620 or a 5370 to take 1000 timestamps/sec.
However may require using some external hardware (frequency divider).
For maximum accuracy and precision the resultant data has to be logged
and processed off line using a PC or other computer.
> (As an aside, if you use a 53132A on a slowly warming OCXO
> you can see the display resolution change when the magic n/m
> threshold, mentioned in the back of the manual, is crossed).
> The bottom line is that the SR 620 or hp 5370 is a better counter
> for TI (single-shot) measurements (e.g., comparing 1 PPS ticks).
> But for CW frequency measurements, the 53132A is much quicker
> due to this extreme internal oversampling. To be fair, I'm pretty
> sure that other modern counters (e.g., Philips, Pendulum) also
> use this frequency resolution trick.
Some Pendulum (A Philips spinoff) and Fluke (rebadged Pendulum) counters
do use an improved (fit linear regression line to time sequence)
More information about the time-nuts