[time-nuts] What is the best counter for a Time Nuts?
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Thu Oct 9 13:52:34 UTC 2008
> When measuring the frequency of a signal using a conventional counter,
> increasing the gate time decreases the noise contribution of trigger
> jitter to frequency measurement noise although jitter is invariant with
> gate time. The jitter simply becomes a smaller fraction of the total
> gate time. Similarly the frequency measurement resolution increases with
> increasing gate time although the resolution (measured in picoseconds)
> is invariant with gate time it simply becomes a smaller fraction of the
> total gate time.
True, I was being a bit sloppy there...
> However if one timestamps a few more signal zero crossings within the
> gate time interval than just those and the start and end of the gate
> time lower noise estimators of the frequency are available.
> The HP53132 averages the frequency estimates for a series of identical
> duration overlapped gate times.
> Enrico's paper analyses this case.
> The Australian paper corrects some of the errors in Enrico's analysis
> and hints how the analysis may be extended to cover the case of counters
> that use other resolution enhancement techniques.
> Counters like the Pendulum CNT91 in effect time stamp every Nth zero
> crossing of the signal and fit a linear regression line to the sequence
> of time stamps. The frequency is then estimated from the slope of the
> regression line. However the CNT91 has limited memory and processing
> power so that full advantage isnt taken of the resolution offered by
> this technique.
> AFAIK no one has yet done a similar analysis to that done for the
> "triangular" averaging counter (by Enrico and the Australians) for a
> counter that does a regression line fit.
Actually, as I recall it, there was a note in one of those articles
relating to it, but your could figure out that it was rendering about the
same conclusion. It also makes sense.
More information about the time-nuts