[time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Racal 1992]

[Ed Palmer]

Hi Alan,

Small attachments seem to be okay.  Let's find out! :-)

I didn't realize that there was a whole family of 9400 series 
oscillators.  Unfortunately, your sheet doesn't include the part numbers 
that the 1991/1992 documentation includes although there are some family 
similarities.  Still, it's good info to have.

Thanks,
Ed

-------- Original Message --------

> Ed off list as I suspect the list wont accept attachments
>
> Best wishes
> Alan G3NYK
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Palmer" 
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
> <time-nuts at febo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 8:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Racal 1992
>
>
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > I have the same info, but it's collected from multiple sources.  I
> > haven't seen all of it in one official source.  I'd like to see it and
> > I'm sure others would as well.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > Alan Melia wrote:
> > > Hi Ed I dont know whther it would be of interest but i have a page from
> a
> > > cat with the comparative specs for those OXCOs
> > >
> > > Alan G3NYK
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: racalosc.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 42689 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/attachments/20090827/3eb6816c/attachment-0001.pdf>