[time-nuts] OT favorite signal generator?
optomatic at rogers.com
Fri Jun 19 14:41:41 UTC 2009
Thanks for your feedback on this.
My needs are probably very privative compared to those of the people on
this list. I service a lot of the time without a schematic so I spend a
lot of time figuring out how the circuit works. I was thinking that if I
injected a signal with a known waveform I could follow it around the
amplification circuits and such. My only real need is to create
something that does not appear to already be there. For instance I don't
see many triangle waves, if I produced one I could following it around
with my oscilloscope. So in terms of frequency just a few hertz would
do, heck even 1 would probably be fine. My only concern is that some of
the circuits are high impedance and have low voltages. It might be a
good idea if I could get down somewhere into the uV range.
Lux, James P wrote:
> On 6/19/09 6:38 AM, "optomatic at rogers.com" <optomatic at rogers.com> wrote:
>> Hey Robert
>> Great tip about the attenuator.
>> I looked up some models on the internet and some look fairly expensive.
>> I know that I will always be injecting low voltage signals, do you think
>> it would be wise to buy a cheaper fixed attenuator, let's say 20dB?, and
>> then just depend on the variable rate that the signal generator?
> How precise does your level have to be? How stable?
> There are surplus attenuators available all over the place, some variable
> ones too.
> MiniCircuits has VAT-nn attenuators which are relatively inexpensive (not by
> "found it at a ham-fest 30 years ago" standards, though)
> Building your own attenuator using chip resistors is another possibility.
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts