[time-nuts] The Demise of LORAN (was Re: Reference oscillatoraccuracy)
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Sun Nov 15 20:54:47 UTC 2009
In message <4B006929.3010809 at rubidium.dyndns.org>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>distance from the jammer until affected. It's a fairly well-understood
>problem and the difference between civilian and military receivers lies
>in signals, keying for access, bootstrapping and testing and
>counter-measures such as IMU.
Not to mention clocks: The more stable clock a GPS receiver has, the
harder it is to jam it, because the "unspread bandwidth" can be
much tighter.
Somebody showed a specially tuned GPS receiver, clocked from Cs to
be pretty much invulnerable to "randomised" jamming.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list