[time-nuts] Fundamental limits on performance
lists at cq.nu
Mon Sep 14 21:14:15 UTC 2009
If you are shaking small stuff at low frequencies, a long throw low
frequency speaker can do a pretty good job as a shaker. You can "eyeball"
calibrate to a reasonable (<10%) level of accuracy.
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 4:59 PM
To: jfor at quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Fundamental limits on performance
J. Forster wrote:
> I've watched a brassboard of a spacecraft payload I was building on a
> shake table. It just weird to watch screws backing out of holes as if by
> magic, components dancing, and plates oilcanning.
> A real education!
Now, that's why I want one for myself... if I had the space and money.
However, it's about acoustics and mechanical design, and I am not
totally clueless on those issues, just not done any *real* work.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts