[time-nuts] Regulating a pendulum clock
mike.cook at orange.fr
Mon Aug 9 17:21:25 UTC 2010
Le 09/08/2010 18:46, Bob Holmstrom a écrit :
> Food for thought.
> I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives to
> improving the performance of a pendulum clock other than controlling
> it with a higher performance clock. If the goal is a better clock why
> not attempt to understand the source of the errors and work on methods
> to control or compensate for them? Teddy Hall has been taken to task
> for using a quartz controlled oscillator to measure the amplitude of a
> pendulum in the control loop of his Littlemore clock.
> Tom Van Baak has developed techniques for analyzing the performance
> and hence potential error sources of pendulum clocks - perhaps he will
> share some of his work here.
> Horological history is full of many attempts at solutions to the
> problem, but it would seem that the creativity of this group might
> generate some new ideas that are more in the spirit of better
> timekeeping than attaching the pendulum to a better oscillator.
> How about a wireless controlled device attached to the pendulum that
> changes its position based on error sensor readings, not time errors,
> but instead, temperature, barometric pressure, gravity, etc. that
> would maintain a more constant pendulum period?
Yup. We have temperature and pressure ICs available , I think that
gravity is pretty constant if the clock isn't being moved about.
Humididty might also need logging aswell. So it should be easy enough to
predict the pendulums response to changes given a reasonable time of
That said, clocks have always been adjusted against better
references.. IIRC Harrison (and probably others) was using star transits
to regulate his long case clocks.
> Bob Holmström
> Horological Science Newsletter
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts