[time-nuts] Phase noise measurement (was - no subject)

Adrian rfnuts at arcor.de
Fri Aug 20 22:09:06 UTC 2010


Rick,

thank you again for having pointed me to the AMC123 that were just 
available when you mentioned them.
Part of the magic is the 10 dB gain and typical +23 dBm output.
So, you don't saturate it with a 10811, which would be bad in terms of 
phase noise, and, on the other hand, if you overdrive it accidentally, 
there is no risk to damage the +23 dBm mixer (phase detector) in the 
11848A test set.
There are some other interesting Anzac models featuring the lossless 
feedback design, but this one fits best.

I was lucky to find some Q-Bit anps (QBH-137 and 138) that are based on 
an almost identical patent but, with 12 to 15 dB, have more gain and 
maybe slightly higher PN.

Anzac patent: 3,624,536 which is the original David E. Norton patent 
from 1971.
Q-Bit patent: 4,042,667 from 1977 
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4042887.pdf

To comment on the Mini Circuits amp, for my needs it has way too much 
gain and +5 dBm 1 dB compression makes it completely useless for PN 
measurement purposes.

Adrian


Rick Karlquist schrieb:
> It is good that you asked this FAQ.  Basically, what is magic
> about the AMC-123 is that it has certifiably low phase noise,
> guaranteed by design and characterization, although not specified
> by Anzac.  The other 99.9% of amplifiers that seem plausible, like
> this one, do not have the sophisticated negative feedback scheme
> of the AMC-123, and likely do NOT have good enough phase noise.
> In any event, we have zero information about the phase noise of
> this Mini-Circuits amplifier.  Having a low noise figure is necessary
> but not sufficient to have good phase noise.
>
> Of course you could always get lucky.  But then you have to also
> build an amplifier phase noise measurement system, which generally
> entails a line stretcher.
>
> Again, thank you for asking this question.  It comes up often.
>
> Would anyone else like to suggest a known good low phase noise
> buffer amplifier?  Maybe something from a Fred Walls paper?
>
> Rick Karlquist N6RK
>
>
> Mark J. Blair wrote:
>    
>> On Aug 20, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Rick Karlquist wrote:
>>      
>>> On the 10811 production line, they would use Anzac AMC-123 amplifiers
>>>        
>> How does this amplifier look for this application?
>>
>> http://minicircuits.com/pdfs/ZFL-500LN.pdf
>>
>> If I understand the specifications properly, the noise figure is better
>> and it has higher reverse isolation and higher gain, but a lower output
>> intercept point.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark J. Blair, NF6X<nf6x at nf6x.net>
>> Web page: http://www.nf6x.net/
>> GnuPG public key available from my web page.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
>>      
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>    




More information about the time-nuts mailing list