[time-nuts] LORAN C antenna thoughts from the group
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Dec 21 22:14:39 UTC 2010
In message <AANLkTimSQsHE+YEhhhydw2V2Edj855SszT78mpQChz0o at mail.gmail.com>, paul
swed writes:
>Is there a real advantage to a 4 or 6 foot big loop compared to a small
>loop?
>I use a 3 foot loop on wwvb/preamp and that works well.
There is a very good and simple explanation of the theory behind
loops here:
http://www.vlf.it/octoloop/rlt-n4ywk.htm
Sensitivity rises with the area of your loop, so doubling the diameter
gives you four times the signal, which may or may not be a relevant
low number of dB.
>One other point on the wavefrom on loran c. It was constructed to minimize
>the impact of skywave influence on the receiver. Essentially making it
>easier for the receiver to distinguish between the two. Thast what I hadread
>in the loran docs.
Yes, this is why you should always zoom in on the 3rd positive
zero-crossing. Inside the announced service areas, the skywave will
never arrive early enough to disturb the groundwave at that point.
>PS I thought the bw was +/- 10KC and even wider.
Yes, it is, but the amount of actual energy once you get past
+/- 10kHz or 15kHz is very very limited.
The perfect bandwidth is where the S/N of the loran-C signal
is 1:1, but I have never found a good way to determine that
automatically.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list