[time-nuts] Small CPLD/FPGA for microcontroller replacement
paulswedb at gmail.com
Fri Feb 5 14:14:32 UTC 2010
Didier that is indeed a tall order.
But at least since the system already exists you have the established
requirements in hand.
So my question is (And I am uneducated in DO-254) is a state machine okay?
Because it sounds like thats what you are forced into. If true then its much
more like the traditional relay logic ladder type of solution. Which has
been pretty good for the railroads for 100 years.
Other comment is perhaps this particular thread rapidly goes offline to
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Didier Juges <didier at cox.net> wrote:
> It looks like I will have to get educated on CPLD/FPGAs on short notice.
> My application at the moment will be the replacement of small
> microcontrollers for military and commercial aviation projects that do not
> want/tolerate software/firmware (some customers and government regulations
> do not consider CPLD/FPGA to be containing software, which to a large
> is a matter of opinion, but this is not a thread I wish to start at this
> time). The FAA in particular puts a much greater burden on microcontrollers
> than CPLD/FPGAs when it comes to demonstrating compliance to DO-254 in
> safety critical applications like battery charging.
> The microcontrollers I have been using are typically from 20 to 100 pins
> (Silabs 8051 family) with a lot of integrated peripherals. I understand I
> will have to use external peripherals like ADC, DAC, probably clock
> oscillator and such with a CPLD/FPGA, where these functions are currently
> integrated in my microcontrollers.
> Part of the requirement is that the devices be immune (as much as
> from SEU malfunction. I was told Atmel (or Actel?) makes flash-based small
> FPGAs that may fit the bill. Most SRAM devices are deemed to be excessively
> sensitive to SEU, even though I cannot imagine how a CPLD/FPGA could be
> that does not use SRAM at all. Maybe it's a matter of quantity? A few
> working registers may be an acceptable risk, but the entire device
> from SRAM is not acceptable?
> I am looking for any information/recommendation on which families to look
> Thanks in advance,
> Didier KO4BB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
> Behalf Of John Miles
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 8:43 PM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] CPLDs for clock dividers
> Yeah, Xilinx 11 is pretty nice. I'm usually allergic to IDEs, especially
> theirs, but I've been pretty happy with 11 so far. I find myself using it
> instead of my tried-and-true makefile for FPGA work, and that's saying
> -- john, KE5FX
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts