[time-nuts] A philosophy of science view on the tight pll

WarrenS warrensjmail-one at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 3 17:12:28 UTC 2010

Steve said:
>Ah! but was it tested against a Shortt pendulum clock :)

No one likes a smart nut,
yes it was, see "swinging Osc"
If you need a copy of the results, Let me know.
As far as I've seen, it is the ONLY unit that has passed the swinging Osc 



> Steve said
>> I fully agree that this test was only done for one input source and it
>> should be done for as many different types
> Not true, it was done it many many different ways and units and levels and
> etc etc.
> I think John spend the better part of a month finding things to test, 
> Bless
> his great effort.
> I think he was wanting to find something wrong with it, but that is 
> another
> story.
> To say he did not consider every noise source he could get his hands on 
> does
> not give if due credit.
> He even made up several new ones,  some on purpose and some not so on
> purpose.

I stand corrected!!!

Ah! but was it tested against a Shortt pendulum clock :)


> and the results where always the same.  The tested worked as expected.
> ws
> ***********


More information about the time-nuts mailing list