[time-nuts] Advantages & Disadvantages of the TPLL Method
peterawson at earthlink.net
Sat Jun 19 21:08:38 UTC 2010
I might shed some light on this topic, but my comments apply only
to a few measurements made in my shop, not part of any PLL scheme.
My intent was to determine the apparent noise floor of a Minicircuits
SYPD-2 phase detector; a low offset, low conversion loss, DBM.
The SYPD-2 IF port was terminated in 600 ohms in parallel with
The SYPD-2 was first characterized for DC output sensitivity with
10MHz @+7dBm on RF & 10.0001MHz @+7dBm on LO. At this
drive level, the IF output is triangular & the "gain" was found to be
800 mV/Rad at 0VDC. I did not perform a tolerance analysis on this
measurement & can only estimate the error at +/- 40mV/Rad.
The 90 deg offset of the SYPD-2 was measured at < 500uV using
+7dBm input power to both RF & LO ports. This measurement was
performed to monitor the 90 deg offset DC for any obvious instability
which might make lower level readings useless; the offset was stable
to +/- 2uV over several minutes.
Finally, the mixer was driven with +7dBm at both ports, but the LO
port signal was delayed by a 90 deg hybrid splitter + a 500ps, DC
to 2GHz, adjustable phase shifter. This configuration allows very
fine (5K part settable resolution) adjustment to reach 0VDC output
from the SYPD-2. The DC output stability was +/- 4uV/ minute after
allowing an hour to reach thermal & mechanical equilibrium
(& having no room temperature transients from my heating system).
If the phase sensitivity can be assumed to scale down linearly,
then 4uV resolution = 5uRad (80fs) @ 10MHz. With more care,
or better equipment, <10fs resolution might be possible; but it
will be difficult. Without knowing the noise type involved, it's
unclear what benefit might be provided by averaging. More
work needs to be done.
More information about the time-nuts