[time-nuts] IRIG B
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org
Tue May 25 23:23:37 UTC 2010
On 05/26/2010 01:09 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Like all the rest of us I'm making assumptions. I *assume* that we're talking about an implementation that will handle IRIG over audio over a fairly wide dynamic range.
Well, like most cases, I'd assume it is over "sufficient" dynamic range.
The signal itself doesn't require very high dynamics, 8 bit should work
well, 12 bits should allow for less care in level settings, 24 bits is
excessive but cheap and only real care is high amplitude/clipping.
More information about the time-nuts