[time-nuts] 60 KHz Receiver

[George Dubovsky]

Speaking of LORAN receivers, I have two Stanford Research Systems FS700
receivers here at work (in central VA) that I have been asked to dispose of.
They both have ovenized oscillators, and I have one original manual. The
antenna is on the roof, but I think it'll stay there ;-). Any offers for one
or both?

73,

geo - n4ua

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:57 AM, paul swed <paulswedb at gmail.com> wrote:

> A great thread by everyone. Oh to make the loran receivers work. But that
> is
> indeed the past. Can not hear Europe on east coast.
> But the question really is, what do you want to accomplish? I don't think
> its a time stamp. Its just to easy to get it from GPS or the network. But
> that could be a secondary use. I believe the primary goal would be
> frequency
> distribution with perhaps a tick.
> If this is the goal then I am 100% in agreement that there are far more
> efficient modulation and recovery methods today. The trick is you need
> something that does not effect the accuracy of the timing and may improve
> the various transmission issues at these frequencies. By the way this list
> has a heck of a brain trust so its very very possible.
> Someone mentioned spread spectrum. Thats very interesting as it is what GPS
> uses and could work at these lower frequencies.
> Like the  "Hey this is just telemetry" comment. You know the FCC does
> indeed
> give temp authorization for quite long periods of time. Years in fact.
> So I would be in the keep it simple mode.
> Great a single carrier with a id every 10 min. Maybe that could be waved to
> 1 per hour or 24 hours. Unfortunately then we have nothing better then
> wwvb.
> The modulation method may be key and then what freq we would use. BPSK at
> higher frequencies is also impressive.
> My first contact was in the indian ocean on 5 whats from boston.
> Regards
> Paul
> WB8TSL
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Bob Camp <lists at rtty.us> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > If you were starting from scratch there are a lot of things you could do.
> > If the intent is to put out something a Loran receiver will recognize ...
> > not so much.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> > On Oct 5, 2010, at 6:44 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > > In message <B69FDCAF-2B39-4575-B5CD-66A87FA1B332 at rtty.us>, Bob Camp
> > writes:
> > >
> > >> Even though it's pule, the RF power is way beyond the sub 1 W
> > >> outputs currently contemplated on those bands. Signal to noise
> > >> *does* matter.
> > >
> > > You know, there are other ways to skin that cat these days.
> > >
> > > Old-time signals had to be grossly inefficient because the receivers
> > > were inefficient, in particular the "ear-wristwatch" kind of time
> > > receivers.
> > >
> > > These days we have spread-spectrum modulation, and if our only goal
> > > is to transmit a timestamp, you can spread pretty wide and far and
> > > need very little power to produce a receiveable signal at long
> > > distances.
> > >
> > > The QRSS hams are playing around with numbers like 17,840,000 miles
> > > per watt, and all it takes to turn that into a time/frequency
> > > services is a spreading function with a really good autocorrelation.
> > >
> > > Obviously, you will not get second by second measurements, but the
> > > measurements you do get, say once per hour, will have much higher
> > > precision because of the averaging that goes into them.
> > >
> > > And equally obvious: propagation effects will take their toll, but
> > > still...
> > >
> > > Somebody with a license should try that on 137kHz...
> > >
> > > Poul-Henning
> > >
> > > --
> > > Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> > > phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> > > FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> > > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
> > incompetence.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > > and follow the instructions there.
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>