[time-nuts] Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators at 10 GHz
EWKehren at aol.com
EWKehren at aol.com
Wed Jan 5 16:52:46 UTC 2011
Strictly for adjusting and comparing two 10 or 5 MHz sources I use the
circuit from the Austron 2110 that takes a 5 MHz input and through mixing
generates 5.0005 MHz subsequently devided down to 1.0001 MHZ. Mixed with the
other input at 1 MHz the resulting difference is 100 Hz which any decent
counter can resolve to nine digits. Works for me and often I just use the Racal
At one time I used the multiplier chain out of a couple of FTS 4050
Cesium's but found the above more convenient for strictly tuning purposes.
Bert Kehren Miami
In a message dated 1/5/2011 3:18:52 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
df6jb at ulrich-bangert.de writes:
I had the same idea as you and my friend Frank and I performed the
experiment to check whether it is possible or not:
Two brick oscillators (I believe to remember in the 8 GHz region) were
locked to the same source (HP8660) in the 100 MHz region which in turn was
locked to my local 10 MHz reference (Z3805). The two signals were mixed
to DC with a M14A mixer. By means of a phase shifter in one of the cables
were able to change the phase between the signals and so to determine the
mixer's sensivity as a phase detector. The mixer's output was sampled with
HP3457 at a one second sample rate. The voltage measurements were then
re-computed into phase fluctuations and this data was fed into my PLOTTER
utility to compute what must be considered the AD noise floor of this
system. I have not documented the results but I remember that the noise
floor indicated a clear improvement against a direct phase comparison at 10
MHz for a given TIC resolution.
What you suggest will produce you a mixer output signal which (when looked
at with a scope) will easily enable you to trim your LPRO within seconds.
you can lock the bricks directly to 10 MHz this is even better.
I have been thinking to use this scheme as a general tool for oscillator
stability measurements. Since we must consider that two odcillators may not
always be THAT close to each other in terms of frequency it would be better
not to mix to zero but to a beat freaquency of say some 1-100 kHz (depends
of course on the brick's pull range). This would involve a offset generator
for one of the signals. I have drawn a circuit but not actually built that
uses a ADF4002 and a DDS block to lock a 100 MHz signal to a 10 MHz signal
where the DDS will provide the possibility to offset the 100 MHz signal in
small amounts. I plan to lock two low noise WENZEL 100 MHz OCXOs to the 10
MHz sources with one of them with a small offset. Then these two 100 MHz
signals are compared after being multiplied by the brick oscillators (I
two bricks that translate 100 MHz to 10 GHz).
Perhaps the group can comment on the feasibility of the plan.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts