[time-nuts] Update -- Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators at 10 GHz

Lester Veenstra Lester at veenstras.com
Thu Jan 27 07:05:03 UTC 2011

For close in phase noise, the kind that is usually of interest, and hardest
to measure, it does work "in general", with the PLL loop bandwidth
limitation noted below for higher frequency noise.

Lester B Veenstra  MØYCM K1YCM
lester at veenstras.com
m0ycm at veenstras.com
k1ycm at veenstras.com

US Postal Address:
PSC 45 Box 781
APO AE 09468 USA

UK Postal Address:
Dawn Cottage
Norwood, Harrogate

Office:     +44-(0)1423-846-385
Home:     +44-(0)1943-880-963 
Guam Cell: +1-671-788-5654
UK Cell:   +44-(0)7716-298-224 
US Cell:   +1-240-425-7335 
Jamaica:  +1-876-352-7504 
This e-mail and any documents attached hereto contain confidential or
privileged information. The information is intended to be for use only by
the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to
the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
or use of the contents of this e-mail or any documents attached hereto is

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Rick Karlquist
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 3:38 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Update -- Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators at 10 GHz

Brucekareen at aol.com wrote:
...........The bricks are extremely low noise
in their own right and are locked with a narrow loop that prevents
source noise from degrading them.

Rick Karlquist N6RK

More information about the time-nuts mailing list