[time-nuts] worth salvaging ?
paulswedb at gmail.com
Sun Jan 30 00:50:36 UTC 2011
Peter was looking at the down converter pixs.
Several comments they are in quite good shape at least these pixs.
The resolution on 2740 and 42 are just at the edge so when you expand
everything you loose the part numbers so if they could be read the frequency
scheme might be reversed out.
I am indeed wondering if the pll arrangement is the same as the austron. 10
Mhz ref up coax First mixer is 1500 Mhz and downconverts to 75.42 MHz first
IF down coax.
You want to scrap these because???
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:03 PM, David Martindale <dave.martindale at gmail.com
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Mark J. Blair <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote:
> > In a receiver that doesn't have a recent almanac, and particularly in an
> older receiver that takes a very simple approach to downloading ephemeris
> and almanac information, initial acquisition could take a long time. It'll
> need to do a slow full-sky search for its first satellite, and older
> receivers couldn't do that nearly as quickly as newer ones can. Once it gets
> that first bird, it may sit there downloading ephemeris and almanac data for
> at least 12.5 minutes before it does anything else. With an old receiver
> from that era, give it at least a half hour of good open-sky conditions
> before you begin to suspect that it's dead.
> It all depends on the receiver firmware. I remember when the GPS week
> rolled over; I was in the process of driving from a conference in
> California back to home in British Columbia, with a GPS receiver or
> two in the car tracking our progress. We stopped for a meal, powering
> the GPS receivers off. When we returned to the car, one of the
> receivers (a Garmin) would not re-acquire satellites no matter how
> long I gave it. I later figured out that the week rollover had
> happened that afternoon, while we were driving, and the first restart
> after the rollover failed.
> But it apparently wasn't just a case of having to do a cold start to
> get a new almanac, because I couldn't get that receiver to work again
> myself. In a little while, Garmin released a small utility that you
> ran on a PC connected to the GPS via its serial port, and it reset
> something that allowed the GPS to do a successful cold start. I
> remember an rumour that it simply reset the saved date and time far
> enough away that the receiver dumped all its old almanac entries,
> forcing it to do a cold start that worked. This suggests that it had
> been keeping its pre-rollover almanac data and tried to use it, but
> there was a bug in the calculation that resulted in mispredicting what
> satellites should be visible where. But that's just a guess - Garmin
> never said exactly what was wrong, or what they did to fix it.
> > Back to the original topic now: That OCXO may seem mundane by time-nutty
> standards, but I'd certainly consider it to be worth salvaging. It could
> have all sorts of applications for radio stuff, portable test equipment, and
> even time-nutty stuff in an application that wants to be smaller and more
> portable than a Rb standard or full GPSDO.
> Yes. If you offered them for postage cost, you'd probably find a
> bunch of takers. You wouldn't even have to unsolder them - let the
> recipient do that. It seems a waste to discard a perfectly good OCXO
> - it would make a fine upgrade to an inexpensive frequency counter
> (many of which just have a bare crystal, not even a TCXO).
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> and follow the instructions there.
More information about the time-nuts