[time-nuts] smallest rubidium

[Rob Kimberley]

I couldn't resist commenting about how top posting annoys you.
Interestingly, I have always top posted ever since my first email way, way
back. Everyone else I dealt with in business did it that way. It wasn't
until I got involved with groups like this, that it apparently became a
problem. 

It always seemed logical to me to have the answers to a question at the top
i.e. the most recent comment in the chain.

No doubt I'll get a lot of replies both top and bottom about this...
:-)
RK

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
Behalf Of Dr. David Kirkby
Sent: 23 May 2011 2:07 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] smallest rubidium

On 05/23/11 09:31 AM, Rob Kimberley wrote:
> Try
> http://www.symmetricom.com/media/files/downloads/product-datasheets/DS
> _SA.22
> c.pdf
>
> Rob Kimberley

Thank you. I don't have know what board area I have available, but I think
think its going to be considerably less than that size. I think the only
option will be to use an TCXO, which to be honest is good enough, but if
there were small rubidiums, I would consider using one. But it seems they
are not as small as I would have liked.


--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.