[time-nuts] Question about precise frequency / phase measurement

Azelio Boriani azelio.boriani at screen.it
Thu Apr 19 19:37:07 UTC 2012


And, if you are measuring, by analog mixing, two very slightly different
frequencies, what do you expect to obtain if not a signal that is slow,
very slow. How can you measure milliHertz or microHertz without waiting?

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Magnus Danielson <
magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:

> Hi Wolfgang,
>
>
> On 19/04/12 21:10, skywatcher wrote:
>
>> Hello @all,
>>
>> my name is Wolfgang and i'm new to the list. :)
>>
>
> Welcome!
>
>
>  I want to measure the frequency difference between a 10 MHz OCXO and a
>> 10 MHz Rubidium.
>> I think that's what many people here have done many times... but i don't
>> want to use expensive
>> equipment like time interval counters with picosecond resolution etc. I
>> would prefer a cheap and
>> easy solution. I also would like to have an update rate of more than 1
>> measurement per second,
>> or even more.
>>
>> My first approach was to use a simple XOR phase comparator. I tried a
>> 74HCT86 and a 74HCT4046.
>> It works, but it's very noisy, so i don't get better than about 10 mHz
>> frequency resolution.
>> If i look at the lowpass-filtered output i don't see a nice sine or
>> triangular wave, but it looks more
>> than a triangular wave with round tops and some bumps between them.
>> Another problem is that the
>> difference frequency gets very low when the frequencies are very close,
>> so it's not enough to look
>> only for zero crossings of the difference signal.
>>
>> Does anybody know a possibility to get a resolution < 1 mHz ?
>>
>
> Have you looked at the PICTIC II project? It's not too bad.
>
> There is several other possible projects to consider, but the PICTIC II
> may be a good start. Also look at a divide down system such as the TADD 2
> divider or the just released TADD 2 Mini.
>
> There is a challenge in doing fairly high precission for low budget here
> on the list. Besides measuring frequency, we pride ourselves in measuring
> the frequency stability, Allan Deviation (ADEV), as good as possible.
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>


More information about the time-nuts mailing list