[time-nuts] PTTI 2012, part 2
Bill Dailey
docdailey at gmail.com
Tue Dec 4 23:10:16 UTC 2012
I will build one right away.. but I didnt see your request. My problem is
surface mount components (the multipin or no leads)... I am not confident
in that. but I would certainly try. I am not a programmer and also
figure somebody with more soldering skills than those I have picked up
ruining things would be desired. I am always willing to try not to ruin
something.
Doc
KX0O
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:25 PM, <EWKehren at aol.com> wrote:
> Paul
> Frankly I do not think I will live long enough to see a time nut build a
> fountain Rb. Over the four years I have watched many smoke and mirror
> projects with nothing coming out of is. In German we have a saying: paper
> is
> patient. We should walk before we run.
> Many members did buy a FE 5680, how many do you think are in operation, if,
> there would be discussions about its temperature performance. take a close
> look on page 7 figure 5 of the brochure, I also see it. Personally I use a
> Shera loop. But that is an overkill and for some to complex since it
> requires direct analog C field control. My real focus is on controlling
> FRK-H,
> M100 and HP 5065.
> What is needed is a coordinated effort to start with temperature control, a
> simple GPSDO only taking care of aging using RS232 interface an analog
> loop for controlling something like a Morion. Stability and accuracy
> could be
> in the 1 E-12 range, low cost able to be assembled by 90% of list members,
> but then I proposed it once before looking for some one to develop the
> filter. No response, it is clear that very few are willing or able to
> actually
> build something.
> When Corby wrote about his experience with the dual mixer / counter, large
> response and we will have a complete documentation set, but when I asked
> for a few that would be willing to build one right away, I would make
> complete kits, I got one response. Sad, but that is the reality.
> How many FE 5680A door stops do you think are out there? How many
> PICTICII's do you think are in use?
> Bert Kehren Miami.
>
>
> In a message dated 12/4/2012 9:49:29 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> paulswedb at gmail.com writes:
>
> Basements the key. So for me bigger is better. Heck if its a rack thats
> ok.
> It gets interesting in what types of components you can use if you are
> willing to go larger.
> Great point on the laser and optics. Funny thing is for small change you
> can actually get used optics bench components at least at the last MIT
> flea
> I ran across the items. They were snapped up by the way.
> From what I have seen of time-nuttery and Hydrogen masers I am actually
> not
> all that sure its beyond this group.
> Regards
> Paul
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Bob Camp <lists at rtty.us> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Indeed, you likely won't get USNO grade with a shoe box sized part. You
> can
> > get one to work and do quite good ADEV. No, I haven't done it, I'm just
> > going on what I've been told. The main point being that for a basement
> > project - smaller is probably lower cost.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: time-nuts-bounces at febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces at febo.com] On
> > Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:19 AM
> > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement; Bill Dailey
> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PTTI 2012, part 2
> >
> > --------
> > In message
> > <CAMPhiorJihW9z6-q0+Qfd+GPLjs6e8_ovWrDxQoxV=92Hgjo8A at mail.gmail.com>
> > , Bill Dailey writes:
> >
> > >If you look at the papers on portable rubidium fountains
> > >they are significantly bigger than a shoebox (65 cm).
> >
> > Diameter is controlled by dispersion of the launched atoms (=recovery
> rate)
> > and the layers of shielding.
> >
> > 65cm looked like close to a minimum for USNO grade, amateurs could
> probably
> > make do with less shielding.
> >
> > --
> > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> > phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
> incompetence.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
--
Doc
Bill Dailey
KXØO
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list