[time-nuts] 31bit ADC, 1000 samples per second

Didier Juges shalimr9 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 21:08:38 UTC 2012


How long does it take to prove it?
And what's the point?


On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp at arcor.de> wrote:

> Am 10.12.2012 21:53, schrieb Didier Juges:
>
>  I do not understand how anyone can guaranty no missing codes when the
>> lower
>> 11 bits are essentially noise? (31 bits resolution versus 20 effective
>> bits)
>>
>
> With that much noise it is really guaranteed that no code will be missing.
>
> :-)  Gerhard
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts at febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts>
> and follow the instructions there.
>


More information about the time-nuts mailing list