[time-nuts] Racal-Dana 1991 w. Option 4C - what is that ?
Hal Murray
hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Mon Jan 30 22:01:06 UTC 2012
lmcdavid at lmceng.com said:
> My understanding is that a 5 MHz crystal is inherently more stable than a
> 10 MHz crystal so better overall performance is achieved by using a 5 MHz
> crystal and doubling the output to get 10 MHz.
What makes 5 MHz more stable than 10 MHz?
Why not 2.5 MHz and double twice? Or 1.25 MHz and three doublers?
--
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
More information about the time-nuts
mailing list